Legitimizing The Social Sector In Latin America

Introduction

Not only neoliberal governments and states with minimal no modernized welfare states, but also left progressive governments to have problems in implementing their respective health policies that correspond to their political ideologies. The political polarization, mud-slinging, and fragmentation that afflicts Latin American democracies are exacerbating government paralysis and hampering the adoption of structural reforms to strengthen governance and fiscal clout as tools for designing efficient and effective public policies that meet popular expectations.

In Latin America, the democratic systems have not only gone through a process of fatigue and growing popular discontent but they have also failed to understand the compass of social, economic, and technological change. The pandemic has exposed Latin America’s structural weaknesses – institutional, administrative, political, economic, commercial, and social – by speeding up existing processes. The deep-rooted distrust of the state in Latin America’s political culture has been replaced by economic wealth, and in some cases, dissatisfaction has become a general rejection of the system.

A History of Social Protection

Social policy and health policy are integral parts of a social project, but their place in society differs. The main objective of right-wing and neo-liberal governments is to turn social and health policy fields of commodification into profit for capital. For left and progressive governments, these strategies are part of social policy priorities and websites, instruments to create social prosperity and a decent life for citizens.

The dominant model of health care reform in Latin America includes a market-oriented. The private subsystem of the insured and a public subsystem of the uninsured and poor. In the health field, this means that the national government has pursued progressive policies. By continuing previous health reforms in Mexico City and the MCG government.

The first political breakthrough was the 1980 Brazilian health reform, characterized. By the constitutional recognition of health care as a universal social right provided by the state. And the organization of a decentralized and uniform public health system. Similar to the Latin American national football team. It developed inclusive notions of nationality. Which were supported by elite players and the public.

Framework for Latin America

The general trend in Latin America in football has been to place football at the service of economic, social, political, and psychological oppression. Professional football has yet to enter a sustained. And authentic political dialogue with the emerging social movements of the larger Latin American. Society on the most pressing problems of the aging region. It is environmental degradation, the collapse of community identity, unemployment, mass starvation, government corruption, or corporate and military rule. In the rare efforts of Latin American professional teams. Individual players and fans have been associated with broader social movements to influence society and public opinion on social and political issues.

Social services

Mexico, like many other countries, has much-needed social services. The entire population does not receive these benefits because of government corruption. One of the region’s most pressing problems is public insecurity.

Cancer is one of the most common causes of death in the region. Affects the poor disproportionately and disproportionately they have limited access to good doctors. No money to pay for treatment and no time to recover from the disease. This means that a major challenge for government reviews is their health systems and the uncertain economic impact. Latin America and the Caribbean have made remarkable progress in some areas. In Jamaica, primary education is above 99%, initiatives such as private schools in Mexico. Where students attend free schools under thatched roofs, and Costa Rica has surpassed attendance records.

The first large-scale social program of this kind is the program to support food, free health services, and medicines for the elderly. Which was conceived as the first step toward universal citizens’ pensions. SUS intends to guarantee the universal right to health as a duty of the state. Achieving this requires reflection on health and on the specificity of social policy as a whole.

Coalitions of interests, framework conditions for policy change, and the role of policy-oriented learning. A systematic review of the impact of social programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. The role of conditional money transfers in the development of the welfare state in Latin America. Die welfare state in the 21st century: The Age of Society, Knowledge-based Economic System and the Sustainable Power of the European Welfare State (2000). Working Paper 390, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands.

Reform in Latin America

This article discusses the fundamental characteristics of Latin American social medicine as the predominant model for health reform in Latin America. Describes Mexico City politics and emphasizes the influence of its values, principles, and concrete programs. The first step is to unlock the potential impact of social change across the region. If developing a transparent process to identify legitimate social change organizations in Mexico. And throughout Latin America. Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance.

The mechanism of evaluation is not transparent.  A single individual is able to receive status in what seems to be an arbitrary selection method. No justification is provided as to why the organization did not receive it. Latin America is well known for corrupt governments, Mexico is no exception, particularly under the administration of Felipe Calderon.  In fact, many UN members have dedicated their careers to battling corruption, seeing it as an impediment to development.   Corruption prevents fairness and equity of services and opportunities among citizens.

This emerging school of thought can only be understood in the political context of an upsurge in popular and student movements and the predominance of the Marxist intellectual tradition at universities. These factors led LASM to center its analysis on the effect of capitalist development and the work process on health and on class inequalities in health.